2016 IT Jeopardy Champions: The IT Futures Summit
The IT Futures Summit had a panel on disruptive technologies, a presentation by an IBM researcher, an a presentation by Mark Nuefville of Spokane Falls College on the NAO robot, an update on the WA IT Program marketing plan/action taken, the IT Jeopardy game, and more… This was an informative, interactive, and fun event. Look for it next year in May 2017.
The IT Jeopardy game took place on the second day of the event. In true Jeopardy fashion, the game featured 50 questions with three daily doubles and a final Jeopardy question.
Meet our IT Jeopardy Champions from left to right:
- Lhoucine Zerrouki Renton Technical College, Computer Science (opens in a new window)
- Stefan Rijnhart Lower Columbia College (opens in a new window) , Computer Science (opens in a new window)
- Jack Sande Clark College (opens in a new window) , Networking Technology (opens in a new window)
- Tim Culler Renton Technical College, Computer Science (opens in a new window)
- Stani Meredith Seattle Central College (opens in a new window) , Mobile Product Development (opens in a new window)
- Melissa DeHaan Columbia Basin College (opens in a new window) , Computer Science (opens in a new window)
- Adam Coleman Clark College (opens in a new window) , Computer Technology (opens in a new window)
- Maricel Medina-Mora, Bellevue College (opens in a new window) , Information Systems (opens in a new window) (Programming)
- Ken Hang Green River College (opens in a new window) , Information Technology (opens in a new window) (Programming)
To say this team dominated is an understatement. Everyone get ready for IT Jeopardy: 2017 as it will be an epic match-up!
The following are available to all WA State IT Program CTC faculty from the Summit:
- The IT Jeopardy PPT (opens in a new window) , Question Grid and Final Jeopardy Question (opens in a new window)
- Dr. Yunyao Li, IBM’s Almaden Research Center SystemT: An Algebraic Approach to Declarative Information Extraction (opens in a new window)
- NAO presentation (opens in a new window) by Mark Neufville of Spokane Falls College
- The Vanity Fair AI Questionnaire (opens in a new window) and Results (opens in a new window)
- One of the best quotes from our panelists, Juan Ulloa, EagleView Technologies (opens in a new window) , on the ethics of AI and the Robotic Rules of Isaac Asimov (opens in a new window) .
“There is a catch-22 in Isaac Asimov’s three laws of robotics. There is a scenario where ethicists have discussed where a robot might be forced to break one or more its laws. Imagine two-self driving vehicles going towards each other on Highway 101. Now imagine that the vehicles are just about to cross each other and a large object from the mountains falls right in front of one of them.
To the right of that vehicle there is a cliff, so the vehicle has only two choices: 1. Allow the collision with the large object to happen, which would prove fatal for the passenger of the car, or 2. swerve towards the oncoming car, which would be fatal to the passenger of the oncoming vehicle.
What do you think should happen? Now imagine that one of the cars is transporting children. Should it respond differently?
Since we are talking about self-driving vehicles (cars), the outcome of this accident would have been pre-determined before the accident happened. So, ultimately, vehicles (cars) will have to have a method to decide which life is more important and it will mirror the ethics and empathy of those who programmed the vehicles.”
- Also, don’t forget to listen to the Center’s podcast series, WAInfoTechTalks.org (opens in a new window)
. We now have 11 episodes that explore with our IT industry guests:
- Robotics/Automation
- Hacking/Security
- Entertainment and Technology
- Web Development/Design/UX
- Big Data (Our latest episodes – Listen to the three part podcast on Big Data)